Oil and Gas: What mortals these fuels be.

Home


 

 

Interviewer: "What accounts for your success, Mr. Getty?"

J. Paul Getty: "Some people find oil, some don't."

Please understand that I am not an investment advisor, registered or otherwise. I may mention particular companies in one regard or another but that does not constitute a recommendation that anyone buy or sell the securities of such a company. I may buy or sell securities that I write about either before or after I post comments on said securities. You should do your own research before making any investment decision. If you chose to invest in ways similar to my own decisions and if such investments result in losses, you are wholly responsible, not me. Also, be sure that you take personal credit if your investments are successful.



RSS Feed
RSS Feed

 

 

Print This Post Print This Post

Gazprom Will Try to Stem Production Falloff

The largest Russian natural gas producer, Gazprom, apparently has heard the concerns of its European customers.  While they have been worrying that there will not be sufficient gas supplies, and while Gazprom’s production has been falling, the company has been spending it’s funds on investments that do not increase gas production.  All that is about to change, according to the following report:

International
Gazprom’s New Focus On Production
Oxford Analytica 04.24.08, 6:00 AM ET

 

Russian gas export monopoly Gazprom plans to increase investment in gas production and transportation substantially while cutting spending on acquisitions. This will reassure European customers concerned about its capacity to meet export commitments. However, Gazprom’s capacity to deliver will be severely tested as it tackles an array of ambitious projects.

Gazprom has been under fire at home and abroad for failing to invest in new production. The company has channeled much of its strong cash flow of recent years to non-core acquisitions, including:

–a $13 billion stake in the Sibneft oil company;

–European downstream assets;

–media interests; and

–stakes in several power plants in Russia.

In 2007, it paid $10 billion for a 50% stake in the Sakhalin-2 project–at the expense of Shell and its Japanese partners–and an increased stake in Moscow’s main power utility, Mosenergo. As a result, it twice reduced its investment program for the year.

Investment plan. In a bond prospectus published in late March, the company said it expects its capital investment to rise by nearly 40% in 2009 compared with the present year, with the total amounting to $65 billion in 2009-10. At the same time, planned levels of financial investment (including mergers and acquisitions spending) is to fall significantly compared with recent years.

As production from its super-giant fields in West Siberia declines steadily, Gazprom is finally taking serious steps to establish a new core production base on the Yamal peninsula, where 26 fields have been discovered with explored reserves of 10.4 trillion cubic meters.

The development of these fields is an enormous project requiring significant new infrastructure. Cost forecasts are in the region of 160 billion dollars. Gazprom will rely on the resulting gas to maintain growth in overall production even as key existing fields decline.

Looming concerns. Behind the impressive figures for coming years are a number of unsettling trends for Gazprom:

Falling production. Output at Gazprom’s three super-giant fields in West Siberia is declining at a rate of around 25-30 billion cubic meters (bcm) per annum. Overall levels of production are also stagnating. In 2007, the company produced 548 bcm of natural gas, down 1.3% on the 2006 total.

Rising demand. Demand is growing in both Gazprom’s domestic and export markets. Russian domestic demand is expected to increase by 50 bcm per annum by 2015. As the European Union’s own natural gas production declines, net E.U. imports are set to grow by around 100 bcm per annum. Russia will have a strong incentive to increase its exports to E.U. member states and is looking to grow its market share from 26% in 2007 to at least 33% by 2020.

Cost pressure. Input costs for new projects in the global oil and gas industry–including contractor services, materials and equipment–have grown exponentially in recent years. According to one calculation, Gazprom’s planned investments for 2009-10 are 2.7 times higher than in 2002, but with adjustment for inflation the increase is only 22.6%.

Price change. Imports of Central Asian gas have played a key role in helping to meet export commitments to Europe. However, these are set to become significantly more expensive following an agreement in March under which Gazprom undertook to pay “European prices” for its gas purchases from the region from 2009.

Capacity questions. Gazprom is embarking on a number of ambitious projects simultaneously. These include new production in the Yamal peninsula, Sakhalin Island and the Shtokman field, and major pipeline construction, including the Nord Stream and South Stream projects, a proposed pipeline to China and extensive gasification projects within Russia. Gazprom also needs to invest in storage facilities and in its aging pipeline network, of which around a third is over 30 years old.

To read an extended version of this article, log on to Oxford Analytica’s Web site.

Oxford Analytica is an independent strategic-consulting firm drawing on a network of more than 1,000 scholar experts at Oxford and other leading universities and research institutions around the world. For more information, please visit oxan.com. To find out how to subscribe to the firm’s Daily Brief Service, click here.

Tags:

Print This Post Print This Post

0 responses so far ↓

  • There are no comments yet.

Leave a Comment

Your comment: