Oil and Gas: What mortals these fuels be.

Home


 

Interviewer: "What accounts for your success, Mr. Getty?"

J. Paul Getty: "Some people find oil, some don't."

Please understand that I am not an investment advisor, registered or otherwise. I may mention particular companies in one regard or another but that does not constitute a recommendation that anyone buy or sell the securities of such a company. I may buy or sell securities that I write about either before or after I post comments on said securities. You should do your own research before making any investment decision. If you chose to invest in ways similar to my own decisions and if such investments result in losses, you are wholly responsible, not me. Also, be sure that you take personal credit if your investments are successful.


If you would like to email me directly, you can do so at
jim's email
Sorry, but in order to protect myself from spammers, you will need to retype my email address.


RSS Feed
RSS Feed

 

 

Print This Post Print This Post

An Army of Forces Lifts Oil Prices

If there were just end users consuming only the minimum of oil they need and upstream producers operating at maximum capacity and that’s how oil prices were determined - how much simpler our investing lives would be. We could see that old oil fields are declining a la Hubbert and new demand is exploding a la Chindia and prices would rise gradually as a constant stream of oil users become gradually priced out of the market. But alas, real life is so much messier.

The Consumer Class Expands, Ironically, With Higher Oil Prices

One complication obvious to all is that in addition to “real” users there are “speculators.” Egads! Not speculators!! Actually, it’s worse than that. We think of speculators as those rich Park Avenue and Greenwich over privileged high testosterone jerks who just feed off the misery of consumers. I have news. The specs nowadays come in a whole lot of shapes, sizes, and organizational structures.

Some financial writers are advising mere mortals who don’t live anywhere near New York to hold gold and oil ETF’s in their “cash” accounts as a way to keep up with inflation. With ETFs just a simple mouse-click away, Joe Investor can easily substitute gold and/or oil for cash, and bingo, he is inflation protected. This is a trend that is non-trivial now but could really take hold as inflation accelerates. In fact, it could become a self fulfilling prophesy by pushing down the dollar and up the price of oil which then cycle through the real economy further raising general price levels - and inflation fears. And so on.

Another new class of oil buyer, institutional investors, are using these same ETFs for a slightly different purpose. Pimco and many other managers are increasing their allocations to commodities as an “investment category” - not for trading or inflation hedging. As one “local” trader interviewed on CNBC recently observed, such institutional category allocations take substantial inventory out of various futures markets and add to the long side on a “permanent” basis. The impact on the price of oil is the same whether a fund buys an oil ETF as a long term investment or a “speculator” buys a tank farm and fills it up with oil.

Speaking of filling up tanks, one of the most prominent speculators nowadays are certain well respected countries. The growth of strategic oil reserves in China, the U.S., Japan, and a growing list of other countries is no more than rampant speculation. Price and profit are not the object of this speculation; security is the motive. But the effect is identical. Rumor has it that India will start an SPR soon.

Another rumor is that major corporate oil users like airlines are starting to hoard a collection of long dated oil future contracts in order to put some predictability into their financial projections by stabilizing their future costs of fuel. In fact, when you think about it, why wouldn’t a lender to an airline now require the company to lock in its fuel costs over the term of the loan by buying long dated futures? That seems to be the only rational way for a bank to feel secure in lending money to an airline today. There may not be enough long dated oil and distillate contracts to make all the banks happy.

So now various sorts of folks are buying oil for purposes other than to use it. Besides you and me, the innocents, filling up our cars and trucks, it’s also now the institution trying to invest like Yale (”be diversified across asset classes”), the private citizen afraid of inflation, corporate users of oil looking for cost predictability and various oil importing countries looking to enhance national security. Add that all up and you get a LOT of demand. And that does not even count Chindia and the oil producing countries like the Middle East and Russia where basic demand is growing at near double digit rates.

I could be wrong, but it strikes me that these various types of oil buyers who are not planning to consume it in the short term are more likely to increase their oil purchases over time than to decrease them as oil becomes scarcer and more expensive. The same is true of oil demand in the oil producing countries. There we know that rising oil prices swell their treasuries and lead to more in-country oil demand. Bottom line: whether the OECD experiences recession or not, oil demand is growing much more rapidly than reported numbers indicate.

Supply is Stymied

And then there is a second complication to consider. What about those faithful oil producers going full tilt to produce whatever oil they can? Well, that world is gone. For one thing, oil producers have so much money from higher oil prices that they don’t need to produce at “Hubbard capacity” in order to have all the money they want. For another they want to leave some oil in the ground for future generations as the King of Saudi Arabia recently proclaimed. You would too. It only makes sense. For a third thing, even if you want to produce at full tilt, as Brazil does for example getting sufficient manpower and equipment to do so is increasingly difficult.

Moreover, life in all producing countries is not as honest and uncomplicated as in Saudi Arabia. Some places, like Russia and Mexico, cut off investment to limit new production. Some like Venezuela, Nigeria, and Iraq face violence and incompetence that limit new production. Some, like the good old U.S. of A. and Canada claim environmental purity as a reason to restrict oil production. All these countries might be producing more oil than they are. The fact that they are not is a form of hoarding by them, whether intentional or not.

Hoarding, the Theme Song of the Age of Expensive Oil

Take a step back and it becomes quite apparent that all these various forms of oil hoarding on the part of both consuming and producing entities is swelling. Higher oil prices that cause increasing anxiety will produce even more of this same behavior. In fact, hoarding could become the determinative set of human actions that make oil so expensive that the world will finally have no choice but to accelerate its transition to the ultimate solution: electricity-driven transportation.

In this sense, hoarding may save the bacon for humanity (forgetting for a moment the enormous human tragedy of those priced out of the oil market and into unemployment and, for some, starvation). In a purely macroeconomic sense, hoarding may be the healthiest form of behavior that we human beings could possibly be taking at this point in history. It may finally force us to move in the direction that nature is dictating, toward electric transportation. And it will conserve some oil to make what we have last longer.

Now, if only we could stop our dumb politicians from yammering about the high price of oil and instead focus on facilitating the future we must inherit.

More on this topic (What's this?)
Oil up $10 a barrel so far today
Chart of US Dollar vs Oil Prices vs S&P500
Read more on Oil Prices at Wikinvest

Tags:

Print This Post Print This Post

7 responses so far ↓

  • 1 paultaut // May 23, 2008 at 12:13 am

    Yup, Yup, Yup.

    You know, instead of roaming the world looking for new oil fields, we should be re-drilling previously large fields which were “corked” here in the US in the 70-80’s.

    Using enhanced recovery techniques unavailable then, we may be able to extract an additional 10-15%. How many Billions of brls are still untapped?

  • 2 jkingsdale // May 23, 2008 at 8:45 am

    Doing just that is a growing trend. Companies like Encore and Denbury are specializing in high-tech “work-overs.” DNR is in the EIS portfolio.

  • 3 Chris // May 26, 2008 at 10:45 am

    OK, so we convert to an electrically fueled transportation system. So that does what, double or triple the nation’s demand for electricity? All those electric cars in the garage have to be recharged every night.

    Given wind and solar are nowhere near being economically efficient, that drives up demand for coal and natural gas for the electric plants and uranium for the nuclear power plants.

    Energy is like a zero-sum game… if you decrease power generation via one source you have to increase another.

  • 4 jkingsdale // May 26, 2008 at 11:51 am

    Chris, it is estimated that a 92 mile square area (about 8,500 sq. miles) of the American southwest could provide enough electricity, using solar thermal technology, to power the entire country. Clearly this source, when added to the huge potential of wind and even tidal power (which is lagging the others in techonological development) could substitute completely for non-renewable sources like coal, natural gas, and nuclear and eventually power the whole country. While we will need huge increases in transmission capability and will benefit from future techonological advances, it is within the current bounds of technology to make this change. When you harness the power of the sun, it is not a zero-sum game.

  • 5 Chris // May 26, 2008 at 7:57 pm

    I should clarify my previous comment… when I referred to “zero sum energy” I was referring to the non-renewable energy sources that are now available. Obviously solar and wind are preferable to the non-renewables and destroy the zero sum idea… which is precisely what we need to do.

    I hope you’re right about the 8500 sq. mile solar thermal farm being sufficient to power the country. How much more development is required to make that feasible from both a technological standpoint as well as a business case/ROI standpoint?

  • 6 jkingsdale // May 27, 2008 at 7:36 am

    Re: solar thermal, to learn more you could go the Ausra web site and do some other web research, including clicking on my collection of “concentrating solar” posts in the “Jim’s Files” area.

  • 7 Has Oil Production Reached a ‘De Facto’ Peak? @ Royal Dutch Shell plc .com // Jun 3, 2008 at 5:19 am

    […] one of the few arguments that can be easily adjudicated.  In fact, group number 2 is correct.  As I pointed out recently, many oil exporting countries could produce more oil if it were not for “resource nationalism […]

Leave a Comment

Your comment: