Oil and Gas: What mortals these fuels be.

Home


 

 

Interviewer: "What accounts for your success, Mr. Getty?"

J. Paul Getty: "Some people find oil, some don't."

Please understand that I am not an investment advisor, registered or otherwise. I may mention particular companies in one regard or another but that does not constitute a recommendation that anyone buy or sell the securities of such a company. I may buy or sell securities that I write about either before or after I post comments on said securities. You should do your own research before making any investment decision. If you chose to invest in ways similar to my own decisions and if such investments result in losses, you are wholly responsible, not me. Also, be sure that you take personal credit if your investments are successful.


If you would like to email me directly, you can do so at
jim's email
Sorry, but in order to protect myself from spammers, you will need to retype my email address.


RSS Feed
RSS Feed

 

 

Print This Post Print This Post

Terminology Is Failing Oil Analysts

Someone please call the English Department to come save the world’s oil analysts.  Words are failing them.

On one side of the net are analysts looking at graphs of oil production and saying something along the lines of Boone Pickins’ recent summary of world oil: we need 87 but can only produce 85.  I’m not sure where Boone gets his numbers since last I looked (see below) the all liquids graphs were showing 87 mb/d being produced in recent months.  But that’s not the point.  The point is that a lot of people are running around saying “peak oil is here” because the fact is that there has been more or less of a plateau in both light sweet and all liquids production since about mid-2006, give or take a little. 

On the other side, looking at the same graphs, is a group yelling “it’s not peak oil, it’s speculators! speculators!!”  Their point is that even though there has been a production plateau, that has nothing to do with the earth’s ability to yield higher flows of oil.  In fact, they say, plenty more oil could be produced if it weren’t for hoarding, violence, and incompetence on the parts of various national oil companies…and speculators.

This is one of the few arguments that can be easily adjudicated.  In fact, group number 2 is correct.  As I pointed out recently, many oil exporting countries could produce more oil if it were not for “resource nationalism policies” - which I call “hoarding” - or violence or apparent incompetence.   Is say “apparent” because some countries, like Venezuela, could be feigning incompetence to hide a deliberate strategy of hoarding.   Moreover, many oil importing countries are hoarding in a manner called “strategic petroleum reserve.”

But the victory of group 2 in the “peak oil” argument should not end the discussion.  Even though the Hubbertian “peak” is not yet here, we seem to have reached some other sort of peak, which simply has not been adequately defined and named in the public square, but which puts a cap on the flow of oil that the world is going to produce just as surely as will ultimately be the case when we reach the geologically possible peak that Hubbert defined and named “peak oil.” 

I’m not sure what to call the peak we have now reached.  Maybe it should be called “Peak Practical Production.”  Or “De Facto Peak Oil.”  Or just, “Th..Th..That’s All, Folks.”  It is a mixture of things.  A lot of it is oil fields around the world that in fact have peaked.  You know the names by now.  The fields in some 38 or so countries have peaked in the Hubbertian sense.  A lot of it is countries - or national oil companies - that have decided not to produce in certain fields.  Some is countries that have adopted hoarding policies that effectively keep adequate exploration and production resources from being applied to reserves.  Some is violence, particularly in Nigeria and Iraq, that physically prevents oil from being produced. 

The mixture of all these human and natural phenomena which together result in an effective peak in global oil flow, as clearly defined in the chart above, needs a name.  Let me call it De Facto Peak Oil.  (If anyone has a better name please let us know it.  We need one.)  My sense is that the components of the De Facto Peak will change over time.  Countries will change policies, some to encourage more production, others to stop it.  More countries will reach the Hubbertian Peak of possible production and begin to decline.  And to some extent I fear that as the price of oil stays high and probably goes higher, more countries with weak governments will become subject to violence and potentially to falling into the category of “failed states.”

This De Facto Peak is not as neat and clean as the Hubbertian Peak.  Since human events are a key part and since they can and do change over time, sometimes for the better, there is no way to “prove” that as things change the actual De Facto Peak may not be further off.  But my guess is that it is here now.  One reason is that the Hubbertian Peak is inexorably drawing closer with more countries peaking every year.  Just as important, though, is the fact that the  increasing value of oil will bring increasing illegal force to bear on the ownership of oil in countries with weak central governments.  In that way, violence against the oil production assets of various countries will become an increasing fact of life.

That’s just my opinion.  But I offer the following article from The Wall Street Journal as Exhibit A in my defense.  It describes the increasing theft and violence surrounding oil assets in the United States.  These events are not having a significant impact on U.S. or, certainly, global production.  But they suggest that if violence against oil production assets can grow in the U.S., then no country is immune. 

Here’s the piece:

Crude’s Price Surge Attracts Oil-Field Thieves

Tankers, Pipelines Grow as Targets; Few Crimes Solved

By BEN CASSELMAN
May 21, 2008; Page B1

Vernon, Texas

As oil prices have soared to new highs, energy companies aren’t the only ones scouring the earth for new sources of crude. Thieves are, too.

A sharp rise in oil-field thefts is driving oil companies and law enforcement to beef up security at wells that are being targeted more frequently as a source of easy money. Thieves are tapping into pipelines, paying off truck drivers and sometimes simply driving up to wells in tanker trucks and pumping the oil out of storage containers.

[oiltheft]

Devon Energy Corp.

Devon Energy has responded to increasing oil-field thefts by installing cameras, which are monitored from a security center at the company’s Oklahoma City headquarters.

Wayne Wicks, a Houston-based private investigator who specializes in oil-field crimes, has seen his caseload increase fivefold in the past two years. “It’s hundreds of thousands of gallons of crude,” said Mr. Wicks. And that is translating into millions of dollars in losses hitting both big producers and tiny independents.

Some companies are taking extra measures to fight back. In the past year, Devon Energy Corp., for one, has installed cameras at many well sites to broadcast images back to the company’s Oklahoma City headquarters. It has held training sessions for local sheriffs’ departments to help them identify oil-field equipment, and it has hired extra security to patrol its wells. The reason: a rash of thefts that included the loss of 600 barrels of oil in a single night, according to the company.

To coordinate with law enforcement across this oil- and natural-gas rich region, the Federal Bureau of Investigation is starting an oil-theft task force in Midland, Texas. But enforcement efforts often end in frustration. Terry Cronkite, a special agent with the Oklahoma Bureau of Investigation’s oil-field theft unit, estimates that only about 10% of oil-field crimes are solved.

The nature of oil exploration means wells are often drilled in the middle of vast, open spaces that are difficult to police. Pilfered petroleum has long been a fact of life in developing countries such as Iraq, Nigeria and China. Theft isn’t new to the U.S., either, though in recent decades most thefts have involved equipment lifted from drill sites.

While stealing crude oil is relatively easy — oil pumped from wells in remote areas is often stored in easily accessed storage tanks next to the wells — selling stolen oil in the U.S. is much harder. Flow meters on wells track the oil and gas being produced at each site, and sales transactions require detailed paperwork on both seller and buyer, making fraudulent transactions more difficult.

But it appears the biggest deterrent to oil-field crimes in the past was oil’s relatively low price. Crude thieves can be charged with a range of felonies, from theft to conspiracy to fraud, and can face up to life in prison. With oil prices under $30 a barrel until five years ago, the risk usually wasn’t worth the effort.

Now skyrocketing oil prices — Nymex oil futures jumped $2.02 to $129.07 a barrel Tuesday — have changed the calculation. And a rare oil-field prosecution under way here is providing the industry with a better understanding of techniques allegedly used to aid oil theft.

PB Oil Co. was set up as one of the hundreds of small-time oil producers dotting the Texas plains. Its owners, Terry Smith and Willie Greening, also worked as pumpers, hired to monitor producers’ storage tanks and, when they filled up, take the oil to a distributor for sale.

Wilbarger County District Attorney Staley Heatly alleges the two men were skimming oil from their clients’ tanks and then selling it, claiming they pumped it from their own wells. Following up on a tip, investigators examined production records filed with the state that they say makes PB’s claims suspicious. The records show that one of PB’s wells, called Lowke, had been dry for two years before it suddenly began pumping 300 barrels a month in March 2005.

[dry]

“That’s just not the way a well will play out,” Mr. Heatly says. Closer inspection found the power wasn’t turned on for the Lowke well’s pump, according to an affidavit of a Texas Ranger involved in the investigation. An analysis by a Texas A&M University geochemist prepared for the prosecution confirmed the oil in PB Oil’s tanks didn’t come from its wells.

Messrs. Smith and Greening have each been charged with theft, money laundering and violation of natural resources, and are awaiting trial in September. Three others have been indicted on lesser charges. All five defendants have pleaded not guilty. Authorities say the alleged conspiracy by the five defendants accounts for virtually all of PB’s production — some 18,000 barrels over three years.

“We vehemently deny these accusations against us and intend to fight them,” says Mr. Smith’s lawyer, Daniel Hurley.

According to statistics from the Texas Railroad Commission, which regulates the state’s oil and gas industry, the number of barrels of oil or equivalent products stolen last year rose 18% over 2006, although the regulators say companies often don’t view reporting the crimes as worth their effort because of the low conviction rate.

FBI agent Matt Espenshade, who leads the new task force, says thefts of equipment have exploded, too. The energy boom has produced a robust black market for items ranging from drilling pipe and hand tools to entire well assemblies.

“The busier the industry gets, the more stuff is out there to steal,” said Mr. Espenshade.

Write to Ben Casselman at ben.casselman [Email address: ben.casselman #AT# wsj.com - replace #AT# with @ ]

More on this topic (What's this?)
Gold climbs to $1250, Oil at $200
2009 Crude Oil Forecast
Read more on Oil Prices at Wikinvest
Print This Post Print This Post

19 responses so far ↓

  • 1 paultaut // May 27, 2008 at 11:19 pm

    Hear the latest out of Russia.

    New exploration companies will be tax free for 15 years, current explorers/producers looking for new fields will only be tax free for 10 years…bye,bye America, Hello Russia.

  • 2 Richard // May 28, 2008 at 7:02 am

    Call it the Gump Peak. (as in Forrest Gump). You remember his famous quote … “Stupid is as stupid does.”

  • 3 Lou Grinzo // May 28, 2008 at 8:29 am

    Love your work Jim, and I link to it constantly on my site.

    I’ve also struggled with a name for this phenomenon. “De facto peak oil” is probably the best option.

    Coincidentally, I just posted about this situation this morning on The Cost of Energy, and how the nature of the rising demand in China and India interacts with geological peak oil and this new-found hesitancy on the part of OPEC members to pump more:
    http://www.grinzo.com/energy/index.php/2008/05/28/test-driving-the-new-oil-paradigm/

  • 4 Ma teen jälle ettepaneku… « Homo homini homo est // May 28, 2008 at 9:47 am

    […] Brown: We must all act together Terminology Is Failing Oil Analysts Waking from the dream Russia worried as oil production slides Oil Price “Head Fake”? […]

  • 5 KV // May 28, 2008 at 3:17 pm

    For the record: I am invested in oil and gas, and I do not drive SUVs or gas guzzlers.

    But:

    If we are short on production, or refining, or storage or all three, why is it that we do not have any line anywhere for gas?

    I will maintain that we have been taken for a ride…

  • 6 jkingsdale // May 28, 2008 at 6:10 pm

    Some poor countries have lines and outages. There is a diesel crisis in parts of China, for example. We can easily outbid poor countries, so we have no shortages in the U.S.

  • 7 Mark // May 28, 2008 at 9:08 pm

    I just purchased a compressed natural gas vehicle this past week as I’m tired of paying for the high cost of gasoline. My cost to drive this vehicle is $0.64 per gallon - one sixth the cost of gasoline. Everyone is pushing hybrids but the payback is not as good as CNG vehicles. Manufacturers have stopped producing CNG vehicles except for Honda. Why aren’t the gas companies and car manufacturers promoting CNG more? Why has the government abandoned CNG? Why aren’t more people asking for this technology? It seems like a perfect short term solution requiring little infrastructure retooling.

  • 8 paultaut // May 28, 2008 at 10:08 pm

    Mark, apparently you do not stray to far from home. You did not mention the mileage nor the distance you get on your car nor did you mention where you got refills.

    My guess is that you purposely left these details out.

    If you really want to be “cool”, why not just buy a golf cart and have a fibreglass body built around it?

  • 9 KV // May 29, 2008 at 6:06 am

    Jim,

    I read up a bit on China diesel crisis. Here is an extract from Reuters:

    Diesel costs about 64 cents a liter at the pump in Beijing, versus around $1 in Singapore and $2 in Britain.

    Is there any wonder why there would not be a diesel crisis in China?

    Chinese (and to an extent, Indians) are trying to control inflation through archiac means.

    Best,

    K. Vora

  • 10 jkingsdale // May 29, 2008 at 7:17 am

    Mark, I think one problem with CNG cars - the same one that makes fuel cells impractical - the requirement that gas stations add an entirely new fuel island. That would be a huge investment and since they make a lot of their income from the coffee and donuts they sell, not fuel, and since they are largely owned by the oil companies that tend to produce a lot more oil than gas, there is little incentive for most distributors to want to handle CNG. That’s why it is mostly appropriate for fleets. But I think it will make increasing dents in the fleet market.

  • 11 jkingsdale // May 29, 2008 at 7:18 am

    Getting back to the theme of this post, I recently saw a talking head refer to the phenomenon discussed above as “Practical Peak Oil”. That sounds good to me. If I don’t hear a better idea, that’s how I will refer to it going forward.

  • 12 Mark L. // May 29, 2008 at 7:27 am

    Paultaut,
    FYI re the details you asked about…. the car I have is a Honda Civic, 220 miles range. I recently drove from San Francisco to LA then to SLC without a problem of fuel stations. However, I had to pre plan my trip to make sure where the fuels stops were. Thanks for the suggestion of the golf cart!

  • 13 cwd // May 30, 2008 at 9:43 pm

    I have been amazed that Arabs have sent their depletable resourse to West for paper dollars which cost nothing to produce for so long.
    As Dr Bernanke put there will never be a shortage of dollars.
    The hoarding issue is one I would expect from a rational person. Why sell more of your irreplaceable resourse than you need for your immediate needs, when you are paid in a depreciating currency.
    It will be worth more keeping it in the ground.

  • 14 paultaut // Jun 1, 2008 at 11:18 am

    Want a Ferrari but can’t afford one, just have someone build a fibreglass body around the Civic. This was tried and failed in the 60’s.

    I read an article about a electric car manufacturer by the name of “Zenn Motors” which uses a new Ultra Capacitor from a private corp. which can recharge in 20 minutes anywhere. Same range as the CNG Civic above, top speed of 120, but it is not expected to be out until the fourth Qtr. of 2009.

    This is the car I will sign up for, they currently sell small non-highway cars for local use at various dealers across the country.

  • 15 Keith Renick // Jun 1, 2008 at 5:06 pm

    FYI…from a recent article by the Author Andrew McKilop, “”Global automobile production and world car fleets are growing at about 6.5% per annum.” “Global trade growth continues at around 10% per annum.” “World airline fleets, and air passenger and freight moverments are growing at about 7% per annum and world agricultural machinery sales, such as tractors and combine harvesters is growing at over 7% per annum.” World construction, urban development including ‘instant new cities’ in the GCC countries, and roads, bridges, tunnels and other construction or transport-linked, oil-dependent activity is increasing at record annual rates.” End. The following from the Newletter Capital & Crisis by Chris Mayer. “The Commerce Department recently announced that America ran a tourism trade surplus of $17.8 billion in 2007.” “That’s more than double the 2006 figure.” “Travel and tourism now account for 8% of America’s exports.” (It may seem odd, but tourism counts as an export). End. More cars, more roads, more machines, more travel. Regards, Keith, Peachtree City, Ga.

  • 16 Has Oil Production Reached a ‘De Facto’ Peak? @ Royal Dutch Shell plc .com // Jun 3, 2008 at 5:19 am

    […] just my opinion.  But I offer this article from The Wall Street Journal as Exhibit A in my defense.  It describes the increasing theft and […]

  • 17 Keith Renick // Jun 3, 2008 at 9:32 am

    Jim, your posting and comments are completely supported by the brilliant Ronald R. Cooke in his book Oil, Jihad & Destiny. It is the computer modeling of his three scenarios that’s amazing, the volume of data. (1) Best case scenario (2) political scenario and (3) production scenario. It’s interesting to see his comments country by country. His thoughts and assumptions are based on very scholarly research and data basing. Running different imputs points 10 different ways. Your in good company with the brilliant Mr. Cooke. Best Regards, Keith, Peachtree City, Ga.

  • 18 Keith Renick // Jun 4, 2008 at 9:03 am

    Jim, I like the book “A very Unpleasant Truth…Peak Oil Production and it’s Global Consequences” by W.D. Lyle Jr, Phd and L.Scott Allen, Phd. On page 10, it explains the different numbers used by Deffeyes and the different numbers used by T. Boone Pickens. (gas condensate), brought to the surface, plus liquids produced at natural gas processing plants. The numbers both men use may be confusing. Page 10 and 11 of this book is interesting. Regards, Keith, Peachtree City

  • 19 from friday // Jun 6, 2008 at 2:54 am

    SIR I LOOKING FOR GIRL TO MARRY 48YEARS GIRL I AM 20YERS MY BOY I AM FROM BURKINFASO WEST AFRICA COUNTRY
    HOPE TO HEAR FROM YOU

Leave a Comment

Your comment: