A study released on 7/30/08 by Amercan Clean Skies Foundation and Navigant Consulting states that U.S. unconventional natural gas deposits are sufficient to supply 118 years of U.S. demand at 2007 levels.  Newly developed fracking and horizontal drilling techniques have made it possible to recover enormous quantities of gas from tight sands, coalbed methane, and gas shale formations, reports the Oil & Gas Journal (8/4/08)

On the demand side, some leaders are starting to advocate the use of NG in lieu of petroleum to power cars.  Two Congressmen, Rahm Emanuel (D-IL) and Dan Boren (D-OK) have introduced legislation to push NG into use for cars.  “We’re going to have a paradigm shift in the automobile business. You don’t often get a hat trick in politics,” said Emanuel.  “Natural gas vehicles solve three problems: the environment, the economy, and energy security,” he said. 

Emanuel is one of the canniest politicians going, so I would not discount the possible effectiveness of his enthusiasm, particularly since he seems to be right.  Of course, the problems of evolving a distributing network for CNG, of making cars available, and of providing retrofits that meet safety and insurance standards are not small.  It seems unlikely that NG could take much market share from oil in the short term.  But if a concerted effort, especially one that is coordinated at the national level, is made, NG might have a significant impact in, say, five years.

In the meantime, it would seem that a super-abundance of NG - U.S. production is already said to be increasing at an 8% annual rate - would have a negative impact on the price of the commodity and possibly on companies in the business of producing it.  But it should have a positive impact on land drillers and any company involved in bringing NG to use in vehicles.

Natural gas is finding more demand from electric utilities.  It is fairly cheap and easy to create and operate a natural gas facility for generating power, not to mention the environmental advantages over coal.  Considering all these factors, a new super-abundance of gas may hinder efforts to promote solar, wind, and other renewable forms of electrical generation that may need subsidies to make them competitive with gas.

Stepping back, it seems likely that it will take some time for all of the implications of a new NG super-abundance paradigm to make themselves understood in both the investment and political realms.  It will be fascinating to see just how significant this development will be. 

Monday’s Wall Street Journal carries an article that explains the new natural gas paradigm in even more detail, as posted below:

Natural-Gas Firms Seek
Outlet for Growing Supplies

Industry Tries to Lift
Demand to Keep
Production Strong

By BEN CASSELMAN
August 11, 2008

As major oil companies search for more oil to meet growing global demand, U.S. natural-gas companies face the opposite problem: what to do with all the gas they soon will be producing.

U.S. natural-gas production is soaring, thanks to high energy prices and new technologies that have unlocked reserves considered too difficult or expensive to tap in earlier eras. Production is up 8% this year, according to government data, and the growth is expected to continue as companies drill thousands of wells in Texas, Louisiana and Oklahoma, and look at massive new reserves in Appalachia and Canada.

Demand is growing, too, but more slowly. Total U.S. natural-gas consumption is up 5.5% this year through May, spurred largely by a gradual shift from coal power plants to cleaner-burning gas-fired ones. Consumption actually fell slightly between 2003 and 2006.

As some analysts have begun to toss around terms like “gas glut,” natural-gas futures have tumbled 9.2% in the past two weeks, and they have brought producers’ stocks down with them. Shares of large natural-gas producers Chesapeake Energy Corp., XTO Energy Inc. and EOG Resources Inc. are all down 30% or more from their recent highs in late June and early July. By comparison, oil-focused Exxon Mobil Corp. is down 17% from its recent high May 20.

“I think that supply growth has become the 800-pound gorilla in the North American gas investing equation,” said Dan Pickering of Tudor Pickering Holt & Co., an energy-focused investment bank.

For consumers, increased supplies of natural gas could mean lower heating and cooling bills, as the fuel generates a fifth of the nation’s electricity and heats half of the U.S.’s homes. But any relief is likely to be limited. Analysts say that if natural-gas prices settle below $8 per million British thermal units, producers will cut back production — which will tighten supplies and drive prices up again.

“It’ll be essentially a self-correcting mechanism,” EOG Chief Executive Mark Papa said.

Cutbacks in production could spell trouble for producers and their investors. Unlike Big Oil, most independent producers aren’t using their cash to buy back stock or pay big dividends. They have been plowing it back into drilling, because Wall Street values the companies on their growth potential. If lower prices force producers to slow their drilling, their growth will slow, too.

To prevent that, the industry in recent months has cranked up its lobbying to boost long-term demand for natural gas. In television ads and congressional testimony, the industry has been touting natural gas as cheaper than oil, cleaner than coal and domestically produced.

“Find me the congressman or find me the policy maker who’s against cleaner energy, cheaper energy and American energy,” Chesapeake Chief Executive Aubrey McClendon said in an interview.

Mr. McClendon, whose company expects to become the nation’s top natural-gas producer by the end of the year, has been especially aggressive. Late last month he lobbied Washington lawmakers to promote compressed natural gas as an alternative to gasoline.

In an interview, Mr. McClendon said he wants to make lawmakers and the public aware of the potential for natural gas. But, he added, “You can only produce what the market wants … We’re not going to expand if the market for that expansion isn’t there.”

Other producers acknowledge they are concerned about supply outstripping demand. EOG’s Mr. Papa said that if recent discoveries prove as successful as companies expect, the industry will need to promote natural gas for both power generation and transportation.

“It’s going to change the dynamics of the gas markets,” Mr. Papa said.

The new supplies could pose problems for importers of liquefied natural gas. U.S. LNG imports are down two-thirds from last year because higher prices in Asia and Europe have attracted shipments to those markets. If new U.S. production keeps prices comparatively low, LNG imports are unlikely to rise.

The U.S. natural-gas industry has a history of booms and busts. Last fall, producers cut back production when predictions of a warm winter drove prices to below $6 per million BTUs.

But experts say the current situation is different. Instead of a single big discovery or a weather-related demand slump leading to a temporary rise in supplies, the industry has found a completely new resource — shale — that could last decades.

Shale — or dense rock formations that are common in many parts of the country and around the world — has long been known to hold natural gas. But production was impractical because the rock isn’t porous enough for the gas to flow.

In the 1990s, however, companies figured out how to crack the shale using pressurized water, releasing the gas. They perfected the technique in the Barnett Shale, a massive shale-gas field around Fort Worth, Texas, that now produces about four billion cubic feet per day of natural gas, 6.5% of total U.S. production and quadruple what it produced in 2004.

The success of the Barnett set off a frantic search for new shale fields, some of them staggeringly large. The recently discovered Haynesville Shale in northwest Louisiana and East Texas has by some estimates 250 trillion cubic feet of recoverable gas, five times as much gas as the Barnett. The massive Marcellus Shale formation in Appalachia could be bigger still. Together, U.S. shale plays could hold as much as 840 trillion cubic feet of gas by one industry estimate — the equivalent of more than 140 billion barrels of oil, more than half the proven reserves of Saudi Arabia.

It is still early, and the actual amounts produced could be lower. Nor will all that gas be available right away. Producing it will require drilling tens of thousands of wells at a cost of billions of dollars. Limited availability of drilling rigs, oil-field workers and pipeline capacity, as well as environmental and regulatory constraints, will restrict how fast production can grow.

But the recent discoveries have put natural-gas producers in a fundamentally different position from their oil-producing peers. Many gas producers are promising double-digit production growth next year. Meanwhile, Chevron Corp. saw production decline 3.4%, and Exxon’s oil production fell 2% in the second quarter from a year earlier, excluding unusual disruptions.

“There’s very little doubt that you can bring this much gas supply on. The reserves are there,” Credit-Suisse analyst Jon Wolff said. “The issue is, does that amount of gas push the price down?”

Write to Ben Casselman at ben.casselman [Email address: ben.casselman #AT# wsj.com - replace #AT# with @ ]

Tags: peak oil energy investments

This entry was posted on Sunday, August 10th, 2008 at 10:01 pm and is filed under COAL, Energy Policy, NATURAL GAS, NG powered cars and trucks, Natural Gas Stocks, demand for gas, electrical generation, oil demand, price of natural gas, shale and coal bed methane, solar stocks, supply of gas, vehicles powered by NG. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.