Oil and Gas: What mortals these fuels be.

Home


 

 

Interviewer: "What accounts for your success, Mr. Getty?"

J. Paul Getty: "Some people find oil, some don't."

Please understand that I am not an investment advisor, registered or otherwise. I may mention particular companies in one regard or another but that does not constitute a recommendation that anyone buy or sell the securities of such a company. I may buy or sell securities that I write about either before or after I post comments on said securities. You should do your own research before making any investment decision. If you chose to invest in ways similar to my own decisions and if such investments result in losses, you are wholly responsible, not me. Also, be sure that you take personal credit if your investments are successful.



RSS Feed
RSS Feed

 

 

Print This Post Print This Post

Maxwell’s Oil Call

Charlie Maxwell, the energy analysts who’s been calling out values in oil and gas companies for decades, recently issued his long range

oil price and supply/demand forecast.   It calls for a range-bound oil price of $75 - $115 for a couple of years or so followed by new high prices in 2011 - 2012, $200 oil in 2013 and $300 in 2015.  His fundamental model is very close the the analysis of megaprojects that I recently posted.  He sees tightness creeping into the supply/demand dynamics in 2010 and increasing particularly in 2013 and beyond, just as I wrote last week. 

On the other hand, Maxwell draws price implications that are more benign than my own.   Where he sees oil at $200 in 2013, I’d be surprised to see it under $300.   And where he sees oil at $300 in 2015, I imagine it will be closer to $500.

There is a tendency to look at the recent oil price spike to $147 and relate it to the weakening U.S. and global economies, drawing a conclusion that the economy is super-sensitive to oil much higher than $100.  That thinking tends to suggest lower limits to the oil price on the basis that a higher price would destroy the economy and therefore reduce oil demand and be self-correcting. 

While high oil prices certainly are a depressant on the U.S. economy, to the extent that the money gets recycled by the oil exporting countries it is more or less neutral for the global economy.  More to the point, the current economic weakness we are seeing has everything to do with falling real estate prices and crazy mortgage and related credit risks that were created long before oil passed $100 a barrel.  In short, our current economic woes, in my view, have very little to do with oil as compared with other factors. 

So I think the wrong lesson is being learned about how high oil prices can go.   On the other hand, Charlie Maxwell is a good deal wiser and more experienced than I am, so if he proves more right than I as to the out-years’ oil prices, it would not be a surprise.  What is gratifying to me is that his view of the timing of oil supply and demand changes and the relative ability of the oil supply to satisfy demand going forward to 2015 is very similar to that which emerged from my analysis of megaprojects data.

Here is how Mr. Maxwell’s recent essay on the matter starts. You should be able to access the entire piece by clicking on the first link above.

image

Tags:

Print This Post Print This Post

2 responses so far ↓

  • 1 Robert Essian // Sep 9, 2008 at 3:38 pm

    Jim, I like this man. I’ve followed him on quite a few places today.

    Not mentioned in his estimates are the geopolitical issues. I can’t imagine that Iran, Russia and the likes have gone away. They would pressure oil upword don’t you think?

    Speaking of Iran, they really have not been of any focus in the media lately. Did they agree to stop enriching uranium?

    I think not…Go Lions

  • 2 Don // Sep 10, 2008 at 8:53 am

    Jim..Good comments!

    What is more likely to have a bigger impact on oil prices…demand destruction, production increase over the next few years or declining worldwide exports? I am going with declining net exports. We are bidding on the oil that is left over. I would argue that Mexico will reduce its exports to the U.S. by half within two years. The U.S. will be bidding for an additional 700k bbd in the open market in two years. Does demand destruction reduce that amount needed? I doubt it

    Predicting oil prices is a difficult game but it is fun to try as long as you don’t put much stock in anyone’s prediction. Personally, I was surprised when oil traded as high as it did because of the increase of production coming online over the next few years but it made me realize that oil prices are going to have alot to do with producer and consumer behaviors. This is something we cannot predict. How much demand destruction do we get? At what point does Saudi Arabia decide it is not in there best interest to pump flat out?

Leave a Comment

Your comment: