Oil and Gas: What mortals these fuels be.

Home


 

 

Interviewer: "What accounts for your success, Mr. Getty?"

J. Paul Getty: "Some people find oil, some don't."

Please understand that I am not an investment advisor, registered or otherwise. I may mention particular companies in one regard or another but that does not constitute a recommendation that anyone buy or sell the securities of such a company. I may buy or sell securities that I write about either before or after I post comments on said securities. You should do your own research before making any investment decision. If you chose to invest in ways similar to my own decisions and if such investments result in losses, you are wholly responsible, not me. Also, be sure that you take personal credit if your investments are successful.


If you would like to email me directly, you can do so at
jim's email
Sorry, but in order to protect myself from spammers, you will need to retype my email address.


RSS Feed
RSS Feed

 

 

Print This Post Print This Post

Oil Sands Investments Cut

 

Oil sands projects slashed as credit crisis hits Alberta

NORVAL SCOTT

From Friday’s Globe and Mail

October 23, 2008 at 7:46 PM EDT

CALGARY — — The full force of the global financial crisis has finally hit the oil sands, delaying two of Canada’s largest energy projects and tempering Alberta’s economic boom.

Suncor Energy Inc. [SU-T] said Thursday that it is slashing its expected spending in 2009 by one-third because of uncertainty over oil prices and credit availability.

Part of the reduction will affect the $20.6-billion Voyageur oil sands project the company is developing, meaning its upgrader will be delayed by one year.

Meanwhile, the consortium behind the $23.8-billion Fort Hills project, led by Petro-Canada, [PCA-T] said it could also delay building its planned upgrader, instead constructing only its planned oil sands mine in order to get crude to market more quickly and cheaply.

Suncor Energy


Petro-Canada

The Globe and Mail

The announcements mean that the upgraders at two of the most expensive energy projects ever proposed in Canada now face delays because of the financial crisis, which has sent oil prices plummeting and made credit harder to find.

Upgraders are expensive processing facilities that turn oil sands bitumen crude into a lighter synthetic product that can be handled by more refineries. Alberta is keen to ensure that they are built within the province so that it, rather than the U.S., benefits from the lucrative work through the creation of jobs and extra income.

The announcements come after other companies, including the Nexen Inc.-OPTI Canada partnership and privately held BA Energy Inc., announced delays at smaller projects in recent weeks.

The sudden rash of postponements signals a potential end to Alberta’s cycle of spiralling costs caused by worker and material scarcity, which has forced the price of new projects through the roof and crippled regional productivity.

“The pendulum is swinging,” Suncor chief executive officer Rick George said in a conference call. “It’s not a bust cycle … but there’s a levelling out of capital spending, making [costs] more reasonable for everybody. Manpower will be available at a cheaper cost in six months than today.”

Suncor had previously planned to spend $10-billion in 2009, but will now spend only $6-billion, financed from the company’s cash flow rather than from debt markets. The bulk of the spending cuts will fall on Voyageur, meaning that the project’s upgrader will now be finished in 2013, not 2012. Voyageur will nearly double Suncor’s output to 550,000 barrels a day when complete.

“What we’re doing is announcing a change in how we execute this project — we’re not mothballing it, we’re not stopping it,” Mr. George said.

Oil prices have fallen by more than half since hitting $147 (U.S.) a barrel in early July, affecting the economics of integrated oil sands projects that include upgraders, which require long-term prices of around $85 a barrel or more to provide a solid rate of return.

Not only do upgraders cost billions of dollars to build, but the price difference between bitumen and synthetic crude has narrowed because of higher North American demand for heavy crude, leaving less value for the facilities to capture.

That’s causing problems for developers such as the Fort Hills consortium — Teck Cominco, UTS Energy [UTS-T] and project operator Petrocan — which last month announced that the cost of their oil sands project had ballooned by more than 50 per cent in just over a year.

As valuations have fallen amid the financial crisis, the cost of building Fort Hills is now more than the combined $19-billion market value of the consortium partners, forcing them to look at ways to defray the huge capital expenditures. “This is just good management,” said FirstEnergy Capital Corp. analyst William Lacey. “The approach [these firms] are now adopting takes some of the strain out of the system and puts more balance into the discussion between corporations and labour.”

More on this topic (What's this?)
Whither the tar sands?
The High Cost Of Oil Sands
A boomtown interrupted
Read more on Tar Sands at Wikinvest

Tags:

Print This Post Print This Post

0 responses so far ↓

  • There are no comments yet.

Leave a Comment

Your comment: