Oil and Gas: What mortals these fuels be.

Home


 

 

Interviewer: "What accounts for your success, Mr. Getty?"

J. Paul Getty: "Some people find oil, some don't."

Please understand that I am not an investment advisor, registered or otherwise. I may mention particular companies in one regard or another but that does not constitute a recommendation that anyone buy or sell the securities of such a company. I may buy or sell securities that I write about either before or after I post comments on said securities. You should do your own research before making any investment decision. If you chose to invest in ways similar to my own decisions and if such investments result in losses, you are wholly responsible, not me. Also, be sure that you take personal credit if your investments are successful.



RSS Feed
RSS Feed

 

 

Print This Post Print This Post

Iraq Aims To Produce 6 mb/d by 2013

Iraqi oil production was about 2.5 mb/d before the U.S. invaded.  It dropped to about 1.4 mb/d and is now back up to just under the starting point.  Iraq’s claimed reserves of some 115 billion barrels (second only to those of Saudi Arabia) are sufficient for it to achieve their new goal of producing 6 mb/d (2.2 billion barrels per year), even if actual reserves are a good deal less than what they claim. 

It’s not clear that Iraq can achieve this new production objective in 4 - 5 years.   The primary impediment seems to be the threat of continued violence, particularly in the face of the withdrawal of U.S. troops scheduled for 2009 - 2010.  There may also be problems with its neighbors, Iran and Kuwait, who’s borders the Iraqi fields straddle.  Absent political impediments, the production goal would seem plausible enough given that Iraqi oil is fairly easy to find and extract and there is a lot of drilling capacity now available to do the job.

I’ve always said that the apparent peaking of the global oil supply at about 86 mb/d that was seen during 2006 - 2008 in the face of rising demand was only partly due to the Peak Oil concept of rapid decline rates in old fields and the eventual inability of new fields coming on stream to overcome that.  The other important constraint to growing the oil supply was above-ground issues of war and violence, primarily in Iraq and Nigeria.  I’ve always maintained that if either or both of these countries manages to turn on their oil spigots as rapidly as nature would allow, the global oil supply could grow substantially from here and Peak Oil would be pushed off for some years. 

Therefore, I think the recent movement toward full exploitation of Iraqi oil is significant.  Iraq could mitigate some of the constraints on oil production that will come about from the recent cancellation of many production projects due to the great price decline of late 2008.  Adding to the Iraqi impact on oil supply is the fact that major Saudi production projects scheduled for 2009 - 2011 may well be delayed and could be re-activated fairly quickly when more demand emerges.   Obviously the voluntary restraints of various OPEC members can also be quickly turned around.

All of this suggests to me that when global growth resumes the price of oil will have some immediate rise but it is not likely to be a robust and rapid increase to and beyond $100 for some time.  The exact time will depend on when global growth resumes.  If we are lucky and that happens in 2010, then perhaps we will see the oil price reach and exceed 2008 heights around 2014 - 2016. 

Of course, two other macro-trends will also come into play, continuing and probably increasing decline rates in old fields and the possibility of a secular reduction in demand due to production and dissemination of far more efficient cars.  Decline rates and increased efficiency are offsetting to each other, but the former is baked in while the latter is hard to quantify at this point.   In sum, it seems to me that the next few years and even possibly the next five years may not see new record oil prices unless we experience a new rapid growth rate in the global economy. 

Here is a report from the New York Times about the Iraqi oil production plans:

Iraq to Open More Oil Fields to Bidding

By CAMPBELL ROBERTSON and ABEER MOHAMMED

Published: December 31, 2008

BAGHDAD — Iraq announced on Wednesday that it would begin a second round of bids to license international oil companies to develop 11 oil and gas fields or groups of fields.

Iraq’s oil minister, Hussain al-Shahristani, said at a news conference that he hoped that these fields could be producing 2 to 2.5 million barrels of oil a day in three or four years. The goal, he said, is to produce 6 million barrels a day in four or five years, up from the current 2.4 million.

The oil and gas fields are distributed around the country and include some that lie near the border or are shared with neighboring countries like Iran and Kuwait.

The first round of bids, announced last summer, is scheduled to be concluded in the middle of 2009. It will be for the development of six major oil fields and two gas fields.

The same 35 foreign companies that qualified to take part in the first round are involved in this one, said Ahmed al-Shammar, a deputy minister, but it is possible that more companies could be added.

Mr. Shahristani said he hoped the contracts in the second round would be signed by the end of 2009. He also said the ministry was planning to announce more licensing auctions in the future.

The ministry has come under criticism for the slow pace of Iraq’s oil production. Although the country sits on one of the largest proven oil reserves in the world, roughly 115 billion barrels, security and infrastructure problems have left them largely untapped.

Iraq is producing far below its capacity, Mr. Shahristani acknowledged at the news conference, but he said opening these fields for development was meant to address that.

“There are about 78 oil and gas fields in Iraq, but only 15 of them are under operation,” he said.

Plunging oil prices around the world have hurt Iraq’s revenues as well; Iraq’s oil is being sold for around $38 a barrel, a ministry official said, down nearly 70 percent from its high for 2008.

One of the other main events of Wednesday was to be the start of the trial of Muntader al-Zaidi, the Iraqi reporter who was arrested for throwing his shoes at President Bush during a news conference two and a half weeks ago.

But Abdulsattar al-Berikdar, a spokesman for the Supreme Judicial Council, said the trial had been postponed because Mr. Zaidi’s lawyer had filed an appeal.

In a phone interview, Dheyaa Saadi, the lawyer, said the appeal’s purpose was to reduce the charge against Mr. Zaidi so that the case could be taken outside the jurisdiction of the Central Criminal Court of Iraq, which specializes in terrorism and other serious cases. A higher court will rule on the appeal.

Though recent statistics report that there were fewer civilian deaths in Iraq in 2008 than in any other year since the 2003 invasion, violence continues to buffet the volatile provinces of Nineveh and Diyala.

Two bombs exploded Wednesday in Mosul, the capital of Nineveh, killing 4 and wounding 20, a local security official said. The target of the first was a police patrol, and the second exploded shortly afterward, as bystanders gathered.

A candidate for the coming provincial elections was killed by unidentified gunmen on a major street in Mosul, a police official said. One policeman died in a gunfight with the attackers as they escaped.

The candidate, Mowaffaq al-Hamdani, was a Sunni Arab. The elections in Nineveh are seen as crucial for the Sunnis. Many of them boycotted the last election, leaving a provincial council dominated by a Kurdish bloc.

A car bomb exploded near a public market in Sinjar, a town in Nineveh near the Syrian border, killing 3 and wounding 35. The Kurds maintain a tight control of Sinjar, which they view as belonging to Kurdistan, a situation that has raised tensions with Sunni Arabs who live in the volatile, poverty-stricken towns to the south.

In Diyala, a bomb, its target an army patrol, exploded near Khanaqin, another area that has been involved in a tense standoff between Kurds and Arabs. Two were killed in the attack, including an officer, and two others were wounded, a security official said.

Mohammed Hussein and Riyadh Mohammed contributed reporting from Baghdad, and Iraqi employees of The New York Times from Diyala and Nineveh Provinces.

A version of this article appeared in print on January 1, 2009, on page A8 of the New York edition.

Tags:

Print This Post Print This Post

5 responses so far ↓

  • 1 robert essian // Jan 3, 2009 at 4:20 am

    Jim, 4-5 years seems on the surfaces to be un-attainable. My knee jerk reaction was to ask a few questions while reading the post.

    1. The factions existing in Iraq would all have to come together and kiss and make up.
    2. Factions bordering Iraq would have to kiss and make up.
    3. Military and police inside Iraq would have to work together under a central command.
    4. The new government would actually have to function seemlessly as the US pulls out of that country.
    5. Outside interference and security of borders would have to be contained.

    I know the list could be added to but these questions seem to indicate to me that 4-5 years is optimistic.

    However, if 4-5 years is attainable then things are going so much better their than is indicated on the evening news and perhaps we could leave now and save some serious cash for our own problems…Peace

  • 2 Karol // Jan 3, 2009 at 4:40 am

    Hi Jim,

    You lost me on this one. How can Peak Oil be pushed off by Iraq coming on-line? I been thinking all along that peak oil was all that was available and not all that was being pumped. That is to say with 1000 billion available pumping 100 million a day is not the same as there are 1000 billion available at 50 million a day. Set me straight please.

    There is a big different between consumer available oil supply and peak oil am I not correct?

    Owning oil stocks is not like owning “fools Gold”. Countries go to war over oil and dream about owning Gold.

    Keep me posted Jim. There is no one besides yourself I can even slightly trust regarding Energy Investments.

  • 3 Karol // Jan 3, 2009 at 5:04 am

    A different view point:

    Iraq wishes it was producing a lot of oil at today’s prices.

    Iraq wants to be able to produce lots of oil at 2013 prices.

    Iraq wants to get money somehow some way.

    How badly I don’t know. But if it’s like Iran, then we know it is driven largely in part by the desire to dismiss a neighboring country from earth.

    Otherwise, Iraq wants the money to rebuild it’s self, on it’s own terms

  • 4 Clifford J. Wirth, Ph.D. // Jan 3, 2009 at 5:31 am

    Peak Oil is here now. If Iraq comes on line more, the decline in existing fields, according to the conservative IEA, is very steep.

    The top story of the year is that global crude oil production peaked in 2008.

    The media, governments, world leaders, and public should focus on this issue.

    Global crude oil production had been rising briskly until 2004, then plateaued for four years. Because oil producers were extracting at maximum effort to profit from high oil prices, this plateau is a clear indication of Peak Oil.

    Then in July and August of 2008 while oil prices were still very high, global crude oil production fell nearly one million barrels per day, clear evidence of Peak Oil (See Rembrandt Koppelaar, Editor of “Oil Watch Monthly,” December 2008, page 1) http://www.peakoil.nl/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/2008_december_oilwatch_monthly.pdf.

    Peak Oil is now.

    Credit for accurate Peak Oil predictions (within a few years) goes to the following (projected year for peak given in parentheses):

    * Association for the Study of Peak Oil (2007)

    * Rembrandt Koppelaar, Editor of “Oil Watch Monthly” (2008)

    * Tony Eriksen, Oil stock analyst and Samuel Foucher, oil analyst (2008)

    * Matthew Simmons, Energy investment banker, (2007)

    * T. Boone Pickens, Oil and gas investor (2007)

    * U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (2005)

    * Kenneth S. Deffeyes, Princeton professor and retired shell geologist (2005)

    * Sam Sam Bakhtiari, Retired Iranian National Oil Company geologist (2005)

    * Chris Skrebowski, Editor of “Petroleum Review” (2010)

    * Sadad Al Husseini, former head of production and exploration, Saudi Aramco (2008)

    * Energy Watch Group in Germany (2006)

    Oil production will now begin to decline terminally.

    Within a year or two, it is likely that oil prices will skyrocket as supply falls below demand. OPEC cuts could exacerbate the gap between supply and demand and drive prices even higher.

    Independent studies indicate that global crude oil production will now decline from 74 million barrels per day to 60 million barrels per day by 2015. During the same time, demand will increase. Oil supplies will be even tighter for the U.S. As oil producing nations consume more and more oil domestically they will export less and less. Because demand is high in China, India, the Middle East, and other oil producing nations, once global oil production begins to decline, demand will always be higher than supply. And since the U.S. represents one fourth of global oil demand, whatever oil we conserve will be consumed elsewhere. Thus, conservation in the U.S. will not slow oil depletion rates significantly.

    Alternatives will not even begin to fill the gap. There is no plan nor capital for a so-called electric economy. And most alternatives yield electric power, but we need liquid fuels for tractors/combines, 18 wheel trucks, trains, ships, and mining equipment. The independent scientists of the Energy Watch Group conclude in a 2007 report titled: “Peak Oil Could Trigger Meltdown of Society:”

    “By 2020, and even more by 2030, global oil supply will be dramatically lower. This will create a supply gap which can hardly be closed by growing contributions from other fossil, nuclear or alternative energy sources in this time frame.”

    With increasing costs for gasoline and diesel, along with declining taxes and declining gasoline tax revenues, states and local governments will eventually have to cut staff and curtail highway maintenance. Eventually, gasoline stations will close, and state and local highway workers won’t be able to get to work. We are facing the collapse of the highways that depend on diesel and gasoline powered trucks for bridge maintenance, culvert cleaning to avoid road washouts, snow plowing, and roadbed and surface repair. When the highways fail, so will the power grid, as highways carry the parts, large transformers, steel for pylons, and high tension cables from great distances. With the highways out, there will be no food coming from far away, and without the power grid virtually nothing modern works, including home heating, pumping of gasoline and diesel, airports, communications, and automated building systems.

    It is time to focus on Peak Oil preparation and surviving Peak Oil.
    http://survivingpeakoil.blogspot.com/
    http://www.peakoilassociates.com/POAnalysis.html

  • 5 jimb // Jan 3, 2009 at 9:18 am

    So can the iraqi’s add 3.5mbpd faster than
    - Xmbpd get depleted
    - BRIC demand increases Ymbpd
    - MENA/producer domestic demand increases Zmbpd

    Currently there’s two things working in its favor:
    - economic meltdown demand destruction (N)
    - marginal efficiency gains in transport (M)

    So, is X+Y+Z = N+M ?

    IMHO not for 09, but if BRIC and the developing world in general recover a moderate growth pattern than all Iraqi production increases can do is help extend the plateau.

Leave a Comment

Your comment: