Print This Post
Further Report on Lynas Deal
A report in The Australian newspaper (affiliated with The Wall Street Journal) provides an insight that is worth considering. It suggests a some key ideas that could be important in evaluating the investment prostpects of both Lynas (LYSCF) and Arafura (ARAFF):
1. China’s exports of Rare Earth Elements (REE’s) is slipping significantly.
2. China may be seeking to both monopolize the REE market and to diminish its reliance on its own domestic supply of REEs for use in its own production of end products. In other words, let the world use non-Chinese REE’s so China can conserve its own reserves as much as possible.
The article’s suggestions of strategic planning behind China’s REE moves (both military and commercial) sound reasonably accurate to me. I would offer just one note for perspective. We should remember that there are U.S. and Canadian deposits of REEs that are in the process of being developed. Thus over time the world may become somewhat less reliant of Chinese REEs (including now Australian REEs) than appears to be the case now.
That said, it still seems strange to me that the U.S. and the Australians would allow Lynas come under the potential control of China, just from a national security viewpoint. Therefore it would not shock me if some better western sponsored financial deal were offered to Lynas before the Chinese deal can be consummated.
In either case, whether the Chinese deal does close or a better deal is offered to Lynas from elsewhere, it seems increasingly likely to me that the company is now on its way to a fairly interesting future.
Here is the text of the piece:
China tightens grip on rare earths
Robin Bromby | May 01, 2009
Article from: The Australian
THE late Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping once said: “The Middle East has oil, China has rare earths”.
Now his successors could add: “And we also have Australia’s rare earths”.
And that means China keeps its control of the global rare earths market - and allows it to call the tune on the future of a number of industries, including electronic and green technologies.
Rare earths came into their own with colour television - europium, for example, is necessary to have the colour red on your (TV and computer) screen; terbium produces the colour green. Dysprosium, for example, is necessary in the production of compact discs and can also be used in some nuclear control applications. Yttrium, among its many uses, has properties that allow it to be used in the transmission of acoustic energy. Batteries and magnets are other uses for rare earth elements.
But these elements have many military applications as well, which gives a political and strategic dimension to the announcement today that China Non-Ferrous Metal Mining will become the majority shareholder in Lynus Corp (LYC), a company which has the Mt Weld project in Western Australia, said to be the world’s richest undeveloped deposit of rare earths. The Chinese will commit a total of $500 million to Lynas, the first tranche being $US286 million to get Mt Weld into production at the rate of 10,500 tonnes a year of rare earth oxides.
It follows less that two months a deal which saw East China Exploration take a 25 per cent in the other main rare earths play, Arafura Resources (ARU). This company has rare earths at its Nolan’s project in the Northern Territory.
And both deals come against a background of China, which produces more than 90 per cent of the world’s rare earths, working to ensure that it maintains its stranglehold on those elements. Use foreign sources, and save our own, is Beijing’s policy. In February it again reduced the export quotas for its domestically produced rare earths: in 2004, Chinese miners were able to export 48,040 tonnes but this has been gradually reduced year by year so that 2009’s quota stands at 30,086 tonnes.
Apart from the military issue that has Washington concerned, The Times reported recently that China being what it called the “ultimate monopolist” in rare earth metals would allow that country control over the future of consumer electronics and green technology.
“The time may be rapidly approaching when it will be impossible for any company to produce a wind turbine or hybrid electric car (this) communist country,” the paper’s Asia correspondent wrote.
And now the chance of Australia to call the shots on its rare earths seemed to have gone for good.
Tags: peak oil investments
Print This Post



7 responses so far ↓
1 Karol // May 4, 2009 at 3:51 am
China
Hording rare earth is a nice thought.
It makes me think SQM may be a target.
2 Jim Kingsdale // May 4, 2009 at 6:08 am
Here’s a different take on the deal from an analyst quoted in a recent Australian news story:
Austock analyst Hunter Hillcoat said Foreign Investment Review Board approval would be more of a risk than it would have been previously because of the political focus on the issue.
“There are obviously concerns that China is buying up a swag of Australia’s resources, but the reality is, if China wasn’t providing the funding this (Lynas) project would not be developed,” he said.
If Hillcoat is right that the Chinese were the only game in town for Lynas, then the new deal may fly through as proposed.
3 jimp // May 5, 2009 at 4:36 am
Thanks for sharing this very unique find. I appreciate your “take” on what looks like a real hidden gem. As always, keep us posted.
4 Pat Woodruff // May 5, 2009 at 3:05 pm
Jim, It is sooo cool that “Asian Grls for Love and Marriage” are advertised on this very page. maybe China is hording rare earths, but young ladies are exported without limits. Funny.
5 Pat Woodruff // May 5, 2009 at 3:07 pm
I pressed “submit ” and the girls disappeared. Darn.
6 jimp // May 6, 2009 at 5:00 am
Jim Kingsdale,
Do you feel as passionate about Arafura as Lynas Corp?
I guess there partially owned by the Chinese aswell. I see Arafura’s stock is up, but no recent news.
Thanks again
7 Pat Woodruff // May 6, 2009 at 1:31 pm
Thinking in bed, I realized that the Chinese strategy with Lynas has smoke and mirrors meant to allow the Aussies to believe what they wish to believe. If the Chinese investors wanted to promise no intent at domination they would buy a 49% stake, not 51%.
The CEO has the deciding vote- who will the next CEO be? hmmm.
Leave a Comment